From 2nd November 2020 it will be complusory for solicitors applying for Probate to use the on-line portal. At present only about a third of such applications are made through the portal - so this will be a big change for the profession. Here's a link to the Statutory Instrument if you are interested: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1059/pdfs/uksi_20201059_en.pdf
It is very helpful for the SRA to publish this. Of course it may be viewed on their website, but for ease of reference we have reproduced it here as well.
Published: 14 September 2020
This guidance is to help you understand your obligations and how to comply with them. We may have regard to it when exercising our regulatory functions.
This guidance is for all SRA-authorised firms and individuals that receive money and assets from clients and third parties and use that money to pay fees and disbursements.
Reporting accountants will also want to consider this guidance when assessing whether a firm has put a client’s money at risk.
This guidance is to help you understand what we expect when you are:
and how obligations set out in the SRA Accounts Rules (the Accounts Rules) must be read in light of your wider obligations set out in the SRA principles and codes of conduct.
Consumer confidence in the legal services market is underpinned by an expectation that all money and assets that has been entrusted to a law firm or an individual we regulate will be properly safeguarded.
This obligation is reflected in paragraph 5.2 of the Code of Conduct for Firms and equivalent provisions in paragraph 4.2 of the Code of Conduct for solicitors, RELs and RFLs.
You must also act in accordance with our principles. These and our codes of conduct are underpinned by our Enforcement Strategy, which explains in more detail our approach to taking regulatory action in the public interest. The following principles are most relevant to this guidance:
Principle 2: You act in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
Principle 4: You act with honesty.
Principle 5: You act with integrity.
Principle 7: You must act in the best interests of each client.
You are expected to be open and transparent in your dealings with the client or third party who has entrusted you with their money.
We expect firms to make sure that clients receive the best possible information about how their money will be used or is being used during the course of a matter. The codes of conduct makes it clear that you must give clients information in a way they can understand so that they can make informed decisions about the services they need, how their matter will be handled and the options available to them (paragraph 8.6 of the Code of Conduct for solicitors, RELs and RFLs and paragraph 7.1 of the Code of Conduct for Firms).
Paragraph 2.1 of the Code of Conduct for Firms sets out that you should have effective governance structures, arrangements, systems and controls in place that ensure compliance with all of the SRA's regulatory arrangements. We therefore expect you to have in place systems and procedures which help achieve the objective of safeguarding money and assets entrusted to you. These obligations apply regardless of the size and makeup of your firm. The effective controls and procedures a firm has in place should act as an assurance for consumers and give them confidence that money that they have entrusted to you will be kept safe.
In many firms those responsible for compliance with the Accounts Rules might sit in a finance team that focuses solely on compliance with the Accounts Rules. All those in a firm that are responsible for dealing with money and assets entrusted to a firm must understand their wider obligations as set out in the Principles and the codes of conduct as well as ensuring compliance with the Accounts Rules.
Firms can receive money in advance from clients and third parties for a range of reasons.
For example:
All of these types of money are client money (as defined in the Accounts Rules) and need to be held in a client account (subject to some exceptions - see rule 2.2 and 2.3 of the Accounts Rules). The money must be kept separate from the firm’s own money which will be held in its own business account (rule 4.1).
In the majority of transactions, firms send a bill of their costs to the client after completion of the matter on which they are instructed or as an interim bill, if the matter is likely to be a lengthy one. When payment in settlement of that bill is received, the firm can properly pay that money into the firm’s business account. As our codes make clear and prior to the delivery of any such bill, we expect the firm to have informed its client about how their matter will be priced and, both at the time of engagement and when appropriate as their matter progresses, the likely overall cost of the matter. The bill should not come as a surprise to the client.
In some cases, however, firms may request payment of their costs in advance of work being done. It is acknowledged that cash flow issues are a common challenge which many firms have to deal with on a daily basis. Requesting or billing for costs in advance is permissible under our Accounts Rules, provided the firm is always acting in accordance with our Standards and Regulations and in particular safeguarding money that it has been entrusted with.
We set out below the factors that you should bear in mind when requesting payment for costs in advance and dealing with such payments subsequently.
A firm might wish to consider sending a bill to a client for their anticipated fees and disbursements – i.e. not limited to incurred costs – with a view to paying the money received in payment of that bill into the firm’s business account (see rule 2.1 (d) of the Accounts Rules).
Our Accounts Rules provide a degree of flexibility on this issue to enable firms to consider the most effective way to deal with their client’s matter and how to run their business. Such flexibility, however, has to be operated in the context of the wider obligations set out our Standards and Regulations and as set out above.
There are clear risks to your client if you bill for, and then pay into your firm’s business account, money for legal work that you have not yet done or for disbursements that have not yet been incurred.
These risks include, for example, if:
You have an ongoing duty to safeguard money and assets that have been entrusted to you and not prefer your own interests, for example in maintaining cashflow, over those of your clients. The obligation to safeguard money entrusted to you is not limited to only that money which is held in a client account.
You will need to think very carefully about the reasons why you are billing for these sums in advance and the risks to your client in your paying these monies into your firm’s business account. It is important to remember that the sending of a bill in these circumstances does not mean that this money is no longer a client’s money and it does not need to be safeguarded because it does not sit in a client account.
In all cases, you will therefore need to think carefully about whether your broader obligations properly allow you to bill for such payments and receive money into your business account.
We would not expect firms to bill for advance disbursements that the client will remain liable to pay for such as Stamp Duty Land Tax, and to receive such money into the firm’s business account. In our view, this would be improper and a breach of our Standards and Regulations. Until the disbursement is paid the client remains liable for it, and this may be for a significant sum. Therefore, any risk to your firm’s business account could result in the transaction failing or the client having to pay twice. Billing to receive money in these circumstances is likely to fail to meet obligations to act in the best interests of your client, safeguard their money or possibly act with integrity.
In all cases where you may be considering billing for such advance payments, you will therefore need to think carefully about whether your broader obligations properly allow you to do this.
If you do consider it is proper, you will need to make sure that your client is fully informed of the risks around their money being received into your firm’s business account. How you explain the risks to clients may depend on the nature of your client and any vulnerability they may have.
Knowing these risks, your client might only be prepared to pay a bill sent for work that has been done and disbursements for which you are liable and have been incurred by you.
You will also need to consider the VAT implications of having money in your business account if you have not yet rendered any services to your client.
Your Reporting Accountant is also likely to qualify its report if their view is such that money belonging to your client is, has been or may be, placed at risk.
It is usual for firms to ask for money on account of their costs from a client, based on an estimate of those costs but where no bill has been delivered. This money has to be paid promptly into a client account as set out in rule 2.3 of the Accounts Rules.
Rule 4.3(a) sets out that when a firm is holding client money and the firm wants to use that money to pay the firm’s costs then the firm:
…must give a bill of costs, or other written notification of the costs incurred, to the client
or the paying party…
If you want to move money for your costs into your firm’s business account, you will need to comply with rule 4.3(a). This is intended to provide a safeguard to the client or paying party.
We would expect you to make sure that the bill sets out only those fees and disbursements that have been incurred. Where the bill does include anticipated disbursements which have not yet been incurred, you will not be considered to be in breach of rule 4.3 by leaving the money associated with those billed anticipated disbursements in the client bank account until such time as they are paid.
As discussed above, there are risks to your client if you bill for legal work that you have not yet done or for disbursements that have not yet been incurred and as a result, you take the client’s money into your firm’s business account. You will need to bear in mind the risks and factors mentioned above.
Your Reporting Accountant may qualify their report if they think these risks are serious or not justified by the circumstances of the case.
Some firms have asked us whether they need to deliver a bill or written notification of costs incurred if they are looking to move money from the client account to reimburse themselves for disbursements which have already been paid on behalf of the client. For example, where the firm has paid for Land Registry search or court fee using their own money (often by a direct debit from the firm’s business account).
Rule 5.1(a) of the Accounts Rules allows money for paid disbursements to be transferred from the firm’s client account to the business account as the money is being used for the purpose for which it is being held.
We would expect you to explain to your client how and when payments might be made on their behalf from your business account and that you will then be seeking a reimbursement from the client account in accordance with Rule 5. You could do this in your client care letter, terms of engagement or in other communication with your client.
Providing your client understands how their money will be used and has confirmed their instructions, we see no risks to the client in your reimbursing your firm for payments you have already made.
This is different to the scenario where disbursements have not yet been incurred or have not been paid by your firm.
See our guidance on Planning for and completing an accountant's report.
If you require any further assistance, please contact the Professional Ethics
helpline https://www.sra.org.uk/home/contact-us
This arises out of a discussion with the ILFM.
Unfortunately, it’s not as straight forward in drawing up a list of what is and what isn’t material breach. Our view is that materiality can be very subjective and often left to interpretation.
To assist practices, they suggest you ask yourself the following questions in order to quantify if a breach is material or not;
If you are satisfied with your answers to all of the above questions, then it is likely to be viewed as a minor breach.
Some examples of what might lead to a qualified report;
We provide a remote monthly COFA & COLP Review service to several firms. Whilst we cannot be the Compliance Officers, we can help doing some of the spade work for them - providing a report for the COFA & COLP and highlighting issues that they should address. https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/colfa-colp-assistance/
Whilst on this page may we invite you to take a look at our other services (see the drop downs at the top of this page). We provide all round Business Support for Law Firms, everything to allow a busy partner to get on with the client work. We have assisted over 350 law firms, direct access barristers and in house-legal. Everything from Compliance to on your Case Management System (LEAP, Proclaim & Clio), from Mentoring to Setting Up a New Law Firm. Ask about running your firm and we're probably able to help. 07887 524507 or [email protected].
The Law Society published on 24th August a very helpful guide. This can be accessed here: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/coronavirus/practical-framework-for-law-firms-and-sole-practitioners-on-return-to-the-office
However, for speed and ease of reference (on the basis that every click loses a percentage) we have reproduced it here. We hope this will be of assistance.
The UK government has published detailed guidance for offices in England, which covers law firms and sole practitioners.
The guidance has been updated to state that employers should consult with their employees to determine who can come into the workplace safely from 1 August 2020. This extends to people who are at a higher risk or clinically extremely vulnerable.
We've updated this framework to reflect the most recent guidance from the government on ensuring a COVID-19 secure workplace, changes to the rules on working from home, when to wear face coverings, guidance on mass gatherings, ventilation and work-related travel.
These are the most relevant points for legal services.
The firm needs to carry out an appropriate COVID-19 risk assessment, just as it would for other health and safety related hazards.
As part of your risk assessment, you should make sure that you have an up-to-date plan in case there's a COVID-19 outbreak. This plan should nominate a single point of contact who should lead on contacting local public health teams.
This risk assessment must be done in meaningful consultation with staff groups.
If you've already conducted your risk assessment (and have opened your offices), you must review it regularly and cross reference it against this practical framework to check that the measures you have put in place are working and identify any further improvements you should make.
Download the template COVID-19 risk assessment for law firms (Word 116 KB)
A meaningful consultation means engaging in an open conversation about returning to the workplace before any decision to return has been made. This should include a discussion of the timing and phasing of any return and any risk mitigations that have been implemented.
Display a notification (90 KB) in a prominent place in your business and on your website to show the firm has followed this guidance
The government has clarified that failure to complete a risk assessment that takes account of COVID-19 or completing a risk assessment but failing to put in place sufficient measures to manage the risk could constitute a breach of health and safety law.
Enforcing authorities can issue enforcement notices to help secure improvements.
Serious breaches and failure to comply with enforcement notices can constitute a criminal offence, with fines and even imprisonment of up to two years.
Inspectors are carrying out compliance checks nationwide to make sure that employers are taking the necessary steps.
Law firms and practitioners must follow instructions from authorities in the event of new local lockdowns and restrictions.
At home | At the office |
Monitor the wellbeing of people who are working from home and help them to stay connected with the rest of the workforce, especially if the majority of their colleagues are on-site | Help on-site members to be connected with those working remotely |
Provide support for workers around mental health and wellbeing. This could include advice or telephone support | Provide support for workers around mental health and wellbeing. This could include advice or telephone support |
Provide equipment for people to work at home safely and effectively, for example, remote access to work systems | As far as possible, where staff are split into teams or shift groups, fix these teams or shift groups so that where contact is unavoidable, this happens between the same people |
Consult, communicate and engage | Identify areas where people directly pass things to each other (for example, office supplies) and find ways to remove direct contact, such as using drop-off points or transfer zones |
You must make sure that your staff maintain social distancing guidelines (two metres or one metre with risk mitigation where two metres is not viable) wherever possible, including:
The government has emphasised that social distancing applies to all parts of a business, not just the places where people spend most of their time. This includes entrances and exits, break rooms, canteens and similar settings. These are often the most challenging areas to maintain social distancing and workers should be specifically reminded.
Some measures to implement include:
The UK government guidance states that from 8 August, members of the public will be required to wear a face covering when visiting premises providing professional, legal or financial services.
The Health and Safety Executive has confirmed that this requirement only applies to law firms with a ‘shop front’ on to a high street, for example where members of the people can walk in.
All other law firms, for example those who only see clients by appointment, do not require their clients or visitors to wear face coverings in their premises. Other rules on social distancing, cleaning protocols and information set out in the government guidance and our practical framework. Staff are not required to use face coverings in law firms. The use of face coverings is discretionary.
You may wish to:
We recommend that you also update policies on whistleblowing, data protection and flexible working, and creating new ones on video conference protocols and how to notify if someone is displaying COVID-19 symptoms.
Read our toolkit on safe return to the office
See our employment law guidance on return to the office
Find out more about our Return, Restart and Recovery campaign
This sector-specific guidance applies to England only. In Wales, similar guidance is being developed and not yet available.
Our Wales office is having ongoing discussions with the Welsh government and we'll update members when we have further insight.
Law firms in Wales should continue to operate remotely, and staff should work from home as default
The legislation recognises that:
The legislation will apply to wills made since 31 January 2020, the date of the first registered Covid-19 case in England and Wales, except:
The legislation will apply to wills made up to two years from when the legislation comes into force (so until 31 January 2022), however this can be shortened or extended if deemed necessary, in line with the approach adopted for other coronavirus legislative measures. The advice remains that where people can make wills in the conventional way they should continue to do so.
When the new law ceases to be in force, people will only be able to make new legal wills using the normal methods.
The legislation applies to codicils (documents that formally modify or amend an original will). Codicils must satisfy the same signing and witnessing rules that are involved in the making of a will.
This guidance reflects both requirements and suggested best practice:
The legislation ruling the making of wills in England and Wales is the Wills Act 1837
None of the existing relevant requirements are changed by the new law.
Section 9 of the Act sets out the requirements for making and witnessing a will as follows, and these requirements remain in force:
No will shall be valid unless -
(a) it is in writing and signed by the testator or by some other person in his presence and by his direction; and
(b) it appears that the testator intended by his signature to give effect to the will; and
(c) the signature is made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time; and
(d) each witness either attests and signs the will or acknowledges his signature in the presence of the testator (but not necessarily in the presence of any other witness), but no form of attestation shall be necessary.
The law also includes a number of other requirements. For example, that the person making the will ‘has testamentary capacity’ - that they know fully what they are doing and are able to express their intentions - and that they are not being unduly influenced by anyone.
For witnesses, the current law allows an executor to the will to be a witness but a beneficiary from the will (or their spouse/civil partner) cannot be a witness without the gift to them becoming void. ‘Mature minors’ are allowed to witness a will, but blind people cannot. There is a general assumption that a witness should have testamentary capacity.
In the existing law a witness must have a ‘clear line of sight’ of the will-maker signing and understands that they are witnessing and acknowledging the signing of the document, for example if self-isolation or social distancing have prevented the signing and witnessing of a will by people in the same room.
The person making the will must have a clear line of sight of the witnesses signing the will to confirm they have witnessed the will-maker’s signature (or someone signing on their behalf and at their direction).
The following scenarios would lead to a properly executed will during the pandemic within the existing law, provided that the will maker and the witnesses each have a clear line of sight:
In the new law, all of the legislation set out above applies where a will is video-witnessed.
The type of video-conferencing or device used is not important, as long as the person making the will and their two witnesses each have a clear line of sight of the writing of the signature.
To reflect this, the will-maker could use the following example phrase:
‘I first name, surname, wish to make a will of my own free will and sign it here before these witnesses, who are witnessing me doing this remotely’.
Witnessing pre-recorded videos will not be permissible - the witnesses must see the will being signed in real-time. The person making the will must be acting with capacity and in the absence of undue influence. If possible, the whole video-signing and witnessing process should be recorded and the recording retained. This may assist a court in the event of a will being challenged - both in terms of whether the will was made in a legally valid way, but also to try and detect any indications of undue influence, fraud or lack of capacity.
The following scenarios illustrate circumstances in which video-witnessing might be appropriately used:
Example 1:
the testator (T) is alone and witness one (W1) is physically present with witness two (W2). Together, W1 and W2 are on a two-way live-action video-conferencing link with T
Example 2:
T, W1 and W2 are all alone in separate locations and are connected by a three-way live-action video-conferencing link.
Example 3:
T is physically present with W1, and they are connected to W2 by a two-way live-action video-conferencing link.
Example 4:
T is physically present with a person signing the will on their behalf (and at their direction), and connected to W1 and W2 by two or three-way live-action video-conferencing (depending on whether W1 and W2 are in the same or separate locations)
Signing and witnessing by video-link should follow a process such as this:
Stage 1:
Stage 2:
The witnesses should confirm that they can see, hear (unless they have a hearing impairment), acknowledge and understand their role in witnessing the signing of a legal document. Ideally, they should be physically present with each other but if this is not possible, they must be present at the same time by way of a two or three-way video-link.
Stage 3:
Stage 4:
The next stage is for the two witnesses to sign the will document – this will normally involve the person who has made the will seeing both the witnesses sign and acknowledge they have seen them sign.
Stage 5:
Consideration may be given to the drafting or amending of the attestation clause in a will where video-witnessing is used. The attestation clause is the part of the will that deals with the witnessing of the will makers signature. For video-witnessed wills it may be advisable to mention that virtual witnessing has occurred, along with details of whether a recording is available.
If you have any questions about this process you are advised to consult a solicitor or will-making professional.
Professional bodies, such as the Law Society and STEP, are expected to be issuing their own guidance to their members on this process, and any such material should be read alongside this guidance.
The Government has decided not to allow electronic signatures as part of this temporary legislation due to the risks of undue influence or fraud against the person making the will. These risks were identified by the Law Commission in its 2017 consultation paper on wills. The Law Commission is undertaking a law reform project which will include consideration of the possibility of allowing electronic wills in the future.
The term ‘counterpart documents’ refers to when two copies of the will are prepared, and while the will maker signs one document, the witnesses sign another copy of the same document. The two counterpart documents between them constitute one valid will.
The Government has decided against introducing counterpart wills as part of this temporary legislation. Although some authorities have adopted this reform to complement video-witnessing, the Government has decided against allowing it in England and Wales in the belief that the risks outweigh the benefits at this stage. Such risks include there being different versions of the will (with different contents), the witness signing the wrong document, and an increase in the risk of undue influence and fraud.
Here is a link to the Government Website for this article/update: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-on-making-wills-using-video-conferencing
The Government Apprenticeship Scheme is promoted as an option by the SRA for a way to assist with the funding of training costs.
It is Government Policy to help people into employment to be able to use their skills and become good tax-payers.
So, you should be pushing at an open door. In October 2020 DWF announced that from January 2022 trainees will be on the SQE using the Apprenticeship Scheme. In April 2021 the BBC In-House Legal Department invited applicants for Level 7 Graduate Legal Apprenticeship in 2022 - to qualify as solicitors through the SQE. So the larger organisations are starting to adopt this.
The big benefit is that the trainee can qualify without a £17,000 debt (as currently is the case under the LPC).
* The government is reviewing whether the funding of level 7 apprenticeships such as for the SQE should continue. Here's a link to their press release of 24.9.24
But that might give employers more flexibility over wages perhaps?
We are interested in helping people who have done their degree to progress with their career. There are so many struggling to find a traineeship at the moment and in limbo. Such a waste of potential, effort and money. The assistance here may unlock all the potential places that exist in small law firms.
Here is a summary of information on how a law firm could use the Apprenticehip Scheme for people training to become solicitors:
Funding for the training
The Apprenticeship scheme is run through a portal. You can delegate a lot of the admin should you wish.
Getting rid of an underperforming Apprentice – Apprentices have no more or less employment rights than any other employee. There is no impact on the apprenticeship funding. There is no clawback from the employing firm. The Training Provider would cease to receive any more money as the training would have ceased.
External QWE Confirmation Service
If you know of someone who needs an SRA regulated solicitor to confirm their QWE but have no-one in their organisation to do so - we can help. This service would apply to someone who is NOT qualified as a lawyer. Please see the link below and feel free to signpost them to us:
QWE - External Confirming Solicitor Service - for Aspiring Solicitors
YouTube Videos on SQE, SQE2 Exemptions & QWE
https://www.youtube.com/@hunningsconsultancy999/videos
Information about employing an apprentice and how apprenticeship funding works – step by step guide and a good starting point. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/employing-an-apprentice-technical-guide-for-employers -
Government guidance for employers looking to take on an apprentice on the Gov.uk website: https://www.gov.uk/employing-an-apprentice.
These apprenticeship funding rules and guidance apply to employers. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/apprenticeship-funding-rules-for-employers
A link to our article summarising the SQE method for qualifying as a solicitor, which comes into effect in September 2021 and the QWE (Qualifying Work Experience) and how to start gathering that now, in advance): https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/the-new-sqe-exam-and-qualification-method/
If you are an Aspiring Solicitor looking to have your QWE (Qualifying Work Experience) 'Confirmed' so it counts towards your 2 year FTE requirement, then we can help. Here's a link to details: https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/external-qwe-certification-service-2/
A link to a page we have put together with the costs of some the SQE training providers - to save you some time in researching: https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/sqe-training-providers/
Whilst on this page may we invite you to take a look at our other services (see the drop downs at the top of this page). We provide all round Business Support for Law Firms, everything to allow a busy partner to get on with the client work. We have assisted over 350 law firms, direct access barristers and in house-legal. Everything from Compliance to on your Case Management System (LEAP, Proclaim & Clio), from Mentoring to Setting Up a New Law Firm. Ask about running your firm and we're probably able to help. 07887 524507 or [email protected].
Like many of my blogs or articles, the idea came from a comment made by a client. This was a small law firm in the Midlands (approx. 10 people).
2 partners told me that things started changing when they asked themselves if they were the blockage. I was impressed that they had the humility, courage and clarity of thought to step back and honestly ask the question. They were both very competent lawyers. They realised that, no matter how good they were, they couldn’t do it all.
The alternative was the same hamster wheel, which would ultimately wear them out, with no chance to enjoy what they wanted to do or plan for succession in due course.
Once that decision was made things flowed from it. Setting a clear goal and holding up decisions in the future against it enabled them to stay on course.
This applies right across aspects of business or personal life.
Are you the blockage?
A great contemporaneous example is the sudden change in working practices which the Covid Lockdown has forced upon business. Working from home, remote working, flexible working have all been held back by management’s objections. The Covid Lockdown meant that blocking that change was no longer an option if you wanted to stay in business. They simply had to find a way.
People don’t like change. It involves risk. It makes us feel uncomfortable. It may require extra effort. Inertia is one of the strongest forces in nature! Also, people don’t like having to face awkward questions. Lawyers and Accountants (perhaps all of the traditional professions) are naturally cautious. They are professionally trained to be so – as they spend their working lives trying to protect their clients from risk or clear up the mess after things have gone wrong. However, if a business is to progress, adapt, survive, take advantage of opportunities, it has to take risks and make changes.
Here are some questions you could put to yourself to find out if you are the blockage …
So – are you the blockage?
We have spoken with the SRA and been informed that they have emailed nearly 500 law firms with a request that by 14th August 2020 the firm completed a questionnaire and a declaration signed that the firm complies with the SRA Transparency Rules. A copy of the email is below. There is a link in it that the firm should click to bring them to the correct place to sign the declaration. It should be completed by the COLP. Please note that the link is particular to the firm, so we have disabled the link in this email so as not to compromise the client from whom we obtained this email.
Please check the junk mail of your COLP if this email does not appear to have come through.
Please do not delay - the deadline is 14th August to have completred this declaration. Thereafter they plan to contact firms (possibly in tranches of 600) every quarter in a similar way. We understand that the initial focus will be firms carrying out Immigration work.
If you need help ensuring that your website is indeed compliant with the SRA Transparency Rules then feel free to contact us. [email protected] or 07887 524507. We have already helped many firms. We have a package to help firms with this. Indeed it was a firm contacting us about this which alerted us. Here is a link to the package: https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Flier-Transparency-Rules-and-GDPR-Review-Package.pdf
Here is a link to a blog we posted in November 2019 which contains the link to obtain your SRA Clickable Badge from the SRA, together with instructions on what to do: https://hunningsconsultancy.co.uk/compulsory-clickable-sra-logo-on-your-website-from-25th-november/
Below you will find the wording for the email.
"Dear XXX
We write to you in your capacity as the Compliance Officer for Legal Practice for OLD VICARAGE ADVISORY LEGAL (KEMPSTON) LIMITED, SRA ID 613473.
On 17 April 2020, we wrote to you about our enforcement of the SRA Transparency Rules (‘the Rules’). The Rules came into effect on 6 December 2018. They are designed to make sure consumers have accurate and relevant information about a solicitor or firm, allowing them to make informed choices. The requirement to display the SRA’s clickable logo (also known as the digital badge) came into effect on 25 November 2019, as part of the introduction of the Standards and Regulations.
We now require you to declare whether you have a website that is compliant with the Rules and displays the SRA’s clickable logo.
The deadline for completion of the declaration is close of business on Friday 14 August 2020.
The link below will take you to the declaration form. It will take around 10 minutes to complete and you will need to ensure the declaration is accurate before submission.
If your firm does not have a website, the declaration must still be completed to record this.
Complete the declaration at: URL for the Transparency Rules Self Declaraton for your firm (sorry - now removed by the SRA).
Is this compulsory?
Yes. We are requesting this information from each COLP on behalf of their firm under paragraph 3.3 of our Code of Conduct for Firms and 7.4 of our Code of Conduct for Individuals. There are no exceptions to this requirement. Your failure to respond may be a breach of our Codes of Conduct.
What will I need to know?
You will need the name and SRA ID number of your firm. You will also be asked basic questions about your website. The declaration will take around 10 minutes to complete.
Do you have any guidance?
We have produced guidance about how to comply with the Rules and our enforcement approach.
To help you understand the Rules and how to meet them we have issued guidance, alongside a Q&A.
To explain our approach to non-compliance you can view our enforcement strategy and the associated topic guidance.
Who can I speak to?
If you require further advice on complying with our Rules, you can contact our Ethics Guidance helpline on 0370 606 2577 or by e-mail at [email protected].
Yours sincerely
Robert Loughlin
Executive Director of Operations and Performance"
At last the Land Registry has moved into the modern age and recognised electronic signatures. They are now accepting dispositionary deeds (such as transferring , creating leases and securing mortgages) that have been signed with a witnessed electronic signature.
Here is a link to the updated Practice Direction: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/execution-of-deeds/practice-guide-8-execution-of-deeds
Here is a link to the article on the Land Registry website: https://hmlandregistry.blog.gov.uk/2020/07/27/electronic-signatures-in-practice/
If you're looking for a reliable method to do this we can recommend some software that we sue for electronic signatures.
The UK the government has published details of the method for British National (Overseas) (BN(O)) citizens ordinarily resident in Hong Kong, and their immediate family members, to move to the UK to work and study. Please find this at the link here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/british-nationals-overseas-in-hong-kong
This is the press release from the Home Secretary: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-announces-details-of-the-hong-kong-bno-visa